Friday, January 09, 2009

Been too long.

I have a thousand things to rant about. Let's start with our newest leader B.H.O. I have never witnessed such inept work from our media. This not only inlcudes the normal biased liberals (NBC, New Barack Channel) but also Fox News did not even try to dig into BO's past. I know everything about Sarah Palin yet no one knows even where BO was born. I have read all the crap out there and it leads me to one conclusion.... NO ONE KNOWS! One thing I find sad is no one is even sure of his name. Barry Sotero? Barry Obama? Any clues out there? How about Bill Ayers (#2 MDL), Rev. Wright, Rezko, Blegoyovich (sp), and many more to be outed??? Well I think this last election shows exactly how bad we are off. People who have never worked, felons and non-citizens insured that BO would be elected. Now for all the rest of the idiots who only heard "hope and change" you will end up long meat on someones spicket someday.

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury." The quote was used by Ronald Reagan and is commonly attributed in one form or another to either French author Alexis de Tocqueville or Scottish professor Sir Alexander Tytler, depending upon the source. Well BO's voters proved this to be true.

The word is the rich are going to pay more taxes, well who is rich? You think George Soros (#1 MDL) is going to pay more? You think the Kennedy's are going to pay more ? Hillary and Bill? If you think the eletist are going to pay more, then I understand why you voted for BO. YOU ARE STUPID!! Also let us not forget the talk of confiscating the working man's 401k for his best interest.... http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/dems-target-private-retirement-accounts.html

Well I think that only BO voters should have to pay more taxes.... wait maybe they should have to pay tax for once in their useless lives.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Let's Wussify America

Please read the follwoing story:

Burleson changes stance on student attack training
03:50 PM CDT on Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Associated Press
BURLESON - Training that taught students to attack a gunman if he invades a classroom was a mistake, Burleson school officials said Wednesday, changing to a stance that students should not physically confront armed intruders.
A spokesman for the Burleson school system said Wednesday the district will continue to train students how to respond in life-threatening situations, but won't show how to take down an attacker.
"That was not something we believe in and not something we supported," district spokesman Richard Crummel said. "It wasn't brought to our attention until they had already done the training."
Teachers in all 11 schools in the Burleson district, located in a working-class Fort Worth suburb of about 26,000, have received the fight-back training over the last 18 months. So did students at one elementary school and the high school.
The district is not backing away from every aspect of the training, still favoring "chaos theory."
"We believe you make every effort to get away from the gunman or the intruder instead of going to the gunman or the intruder," Crummel said. "You create chaos to get away. You don't create chaos to take the gunman down."
The district sent letters to parents Friday expressing regret for the training and saying the district "does not, nor will we support teaching our students to attack an intruder."
The letter was signed by every principal in the district except for Norwood Elementary principal Lisa Crane, whose husband, Greg, originally suggested the training. Greg Crane, a former police officer, is a teacher at the high school. Greg Crane did not immediately return a phone message or email seeking comment Wednesday.
Burleson officials have fielded calls from parents, law-enforcement officials and other school districts since the policy made national news this month.
"On a national level, people are calling in and saying bravo for at least looking at other options," Crummel said. "On a local level, people are concerned about one thing: how it affects their children."
The district's emergency training covered various emergencies, such as tornadoes, fires and situations where first aid is required. But the most controversial aspect of the training had to do with armed intruders.
Students learned to not comply with a gunman's orders and to take him down. They also learned how to treat gunshot wounds, use a belt as a sling and to use shoelaces for tourniquets.
Robin Browne of Response Options, the company providing the training, has said Burleson wanted all students and teachers trained to fight back by the end of 2007. It was believed to be the first school district in the country to undertake this training, Browne said.
The district has paid Response Options about $2,000, Crummel said. No additional training has been scheduled.
Browne did not immediately return a call Wednesday.


Now this was a great idea!!!! If this New America was taught to fight back against agressors, by God there would of not been a 911! The liberal left wants us to stand there and wimper as a gunman ties our hands and shoots us in the head. Teach our children to fight back against agression. The poor little girls in Pennsylvania.... if the whole class would of attacked the guy they would still be alive. Even in Columbine, if the kids would of fought back there might have been less killed.
Now look at 911 hi-jackings.... who were the heroes? Flight 93, they fought back, and they died. But we know who they are! God bless the Hero!
Who ever thought of teaching these kids to protect themselves was an absolute genious. All of those liberals who are saying it is not a good idea..... well they are liberals!

Friday, September 29, 2006

Illegal Aliens

It is amazing that we do not keep records on illegals who commit crimes (sanctuary). If we did start making an effort to track and punish these felons we would reduce violent crime many times over. Now if you figure just 10% of illegals are criminals, and there are 11 million here, we can get rid of 1.1 million criminals just by enforcing our current laws. Then we have to have a strict border to keeep them out. Now that's what I want to discuss, the border security.
First of all we should mine the entire border with non-lethal mines. There are gas mines, small explosive mines that put salt in your skin etc. Then as we capture illegals we can make them build the wall for their sentence. With in a year there will be no longer any border crossings to speak of. Next you must arrest all employers who hire illegals, knowingly, to also go build the wall, this will reduce the tempting for them to hire cheap labor. Wall is built incentives to come here are greatly reduced. Now we deal with persons here. If you are stopped by any officer of the law and you can not prove you are a legal resident, you are immediate arrested and taken to a holding area. From here you have 30 days to prove that you are a citizen. At the end of the 30 days you are sent to the southern border to build the wall for 2 years. At the end of that 2 years you can apply for citizenship. Sounds tough but I think it is necessary to protect our citizens.

Monday, February 06, 2006

A Cartoon is worth a million words!

I am not surprised at the outrage by the Muslims about the Muhammad cartoon. In fact that just tells you where they stand, off keel. Where were the protests when 3,000 Americans died by the Muslims, yet here is a cartoon and thousands rush to the street chanting the same old Bullshit, death to so and so! Death to Belgium! Death to Norway! Death to Monaco! ....... I think this is a great time to get rid of lots of folks that perhaps should not be allowed to reproduce. How about all the worlds people come out "Death to The Muslims!" Wow that would be a great day, the moderate Muslims would profile reconsider their religion, and the radicals would come out of their holes so we could kill their ass! I want to have protests in America burning Middle Eastern Flags yelling and chanting death to all Muslims! Death to all Muslims! Death to all Muslims!..........Once again that would be a great day in our history. Let them hear what spouts from their mouths and see how they like it..... Shoe on the other foot sort. Just a side note, there is baby clothing being made that says "I Love Al Qaida"..... Maybe we should target the symbol as Wyatt Earp went after red sashes in the old west. America is becoming more and more pussified the further we get from 9/11. In five years some more hijackers will get on an airplane with cookie cutters and the whole damn flight of people will submit. They will fly it into something or another and then we will be back at 9/11/2001..... a bunch of idiots wondering how this happened. Oh well freedom has its price I guess.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

OK NOW IM PISSED

Hijacker Sought By U.S. Released
Germany Frees Hezbollah Member Who Killed Md. Sailor in '85 Plot

Now this deserves a boycott. As we are trying to capture terrorist freaking Germany is letting them go! Now any American has to take offense to this action by Germany. (Sorry Donna you are not getting your BMW next year). I can not even tell people how much this angers me. All of mainland Europe needs an ass whoopin'. Germany knew we wanted this guy, and that is the reason they hid his release. This is all bullshit. I have to say if Congress had any balls it would immediately sanction Germany! In fact time to write my State Senator.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Defending America from Lies

Lately I have spent way too much time defending America's actions around the world. I have been posting on Kevin Sites Hotzone from yahoo. These people are haters of America, they don't want to hear the truth, they just want to hate. Excerpts of my defense:

The article we are suppose to be talking about seems to have fallen into the neverending Bush haters. So back to the article. I love this statement "On Sept. 13, 2001, one such angry American, Patrick Cunningham, tried to start a fire in my local mosque's garage." ....... Ok 1 drunk American does something stupid and he is equal to OBL! This is what the author is saying. Basically she is comparing the intolerant Americans who subjugate all the minorities to the Muslim world (sarcasm). Hey let's not forget about the 350 children in Beslan murdered by self proclaimed martys! The thousands if Iraqi's killed by suicide bombers, the millions killed in Africa..... all in the name of Islam. Come on folks , wake up and smell the coffee, we can attack a lot "muslim nations" and have plenty of reason to do so. Less we forget Lockerby Scotland, we should of bombed the hell out of Mohmar Kadiffi (sp). The attack on the USS Stark in 1988 was enough to destroy Iraq. The KLA in Kosovo was responsible for thousands of deaths. America seems pretty forgiving to me. The US is moderate as far as our reactions to all the attacks perpetrated by Muslims, supported by "Muslim Nations". Where are the voices of the moderate Muslims. I never here them speak out in these forums about how awful it is that these groups do this in the name of Islam, they sit back and complain about how America reacts to being attacked. How America is evil, last time I looked we didn't send SFO into a Iranian Schools and kill all its children! So you left wing looneys take a look in the mirror, read a little history and understand these people will kill you just like they kill their neighbors. I would rather fight them in the streets of Iraq with the best trained Army in the world intsead of trying to stop them before they get on a bus, plane or subway here in the U.S.

Posted by feet_smellin on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 5:02 PM ET

Now this is for Gildo20032002. I can't believe I am responding to your fanaticism...but I must. Do your research! As a doctor you must realize the effects of nerve agents, if not ask the Kurds! You talk as if everyone in the country of Iraq loved Saddam, you must watch too much CNN instead of doing your own research. Also Iraq started this war in 1988 with the attack on the USS Stark. You are just angry because America is defeating facism. The previous Iraqi goverment was responsible for attacking it's neighbors at a whim, well they won't do that anymore. My advice is take the time to read some of the moderate Iraqi websites, you may possibly have a different veiw on what is really occuring there. Also some Iraqi's may not want us occupying their country. I would bet it is the same percentage of Germans that didn't want us occupying their country in 1945. For a being an educated person (doctor) I am suprised that you are so ignorant on the facts of the middle east.
Posted by feet_smellin on Mon, Dec 12, 2005 6:39 PM ET


gildo20032002- I understand what you are saying, I just don't agree. Under your logic (innocent people dieing) we should of not been involved in WW2. 12 million people died in that war, and a majority of them were civilians. Germany was no direct threat to the U.S.in 1942. But the U.S. understood that if Hitler would of stayed in power that he would of progressed into a threat to the entire world. If we would of not intervened Hitler would have developed a nuclear weapon and subjugated the entire world into his facist beliefs. Now you tell me how this is any different. Iraq was a threat, we changed regimes, the world is a better place with out Saddam and his influence in the middle east, and someday you will realize that, but I doubt you will admit it.
Posted by feet_smellin on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 12:14 PM ET

http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs1469?rf=429

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Continued Lies

Stop blaming the federal government about the hurricane!

There are two other people who have the authority to activate the National Gaurd; the Gov can activate those NGs in their own state and the local sherrif can activate those NGs within his/her own county. Which begs the question, Why did they wait for Bush to activate the NGs. Answer: MONEY. If Gov/Sherrif activate the NGs they (the State) assumes the costs: salaries, food, housing, fuel, transportation, etc. If the President activates the NGs then the federal government picks up the costs. So LA and MS saved a bunch of money by waiting for the Pres to activate the Guard. If they, Gov and Sherrif, had activated the NGs, they would have been on the streets in a matter of hours, not days. Also what they did not understand is that if they had activated the NGs, as soon as the President started activations, their troops would have been covered by the federal order. And, they would have still saved money, but, the troops would have been there much sooner. ( Taken from several sources)

Sounds like the govenors are guilty of putting money before lives.......